Re: gdb 8.x - g++ 7.x compatibility

[Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Roman Popov <ripopov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is there any progress on this problem?
>>
>> I'm not familiar with G++ , but I have little experience with LLVM.  I can
>> try make LLVM emitting mangled names to DW_AT_name, instead of demangled
>> ones.
>> This way GDB can match DW_AT_name against RTTI. And for display it can
>> call  abi::__cxa_demangle(name, NULL, NULL, &status), from #include
>> <cxxabi.h>.
>>
>> Will it work?
>
>
> Reading http://wiki.dwarfstd.org/index.php?title=Best_Practices:
> the DW_AT_name attribute should contain the name of the corresponding
> program object as it appears in the source code, without any
> qualifiers such as namespaces, containing classes, or modules (see
> Section 2.15). A consumer can easily reconstruct the fully-qualified
> name from the DIE hierarchy. In general, the value of DW_AT_name
> should be such that a fully-qualified name constructed from the
> DW_AT_name attributes of the object and its containing objects will
> uniquely represent that object in a form natural to the source
> language.
>
>
> So having the mangled symbol in DW_AT_name seems backwards and not the
> point of it.

If we add the mangled name, which seems reasonable, it should be in
DW_AT_linkage_name.

Jason