On Wed, Mar 8, 2023, 2:41 PM Chris Johns <chrisj@rtems.org> wrote:

> On 9/3/2023 6:36 am, Simon Marchi wrote:
> >> There is another version installed here:
> >>
> >> $ pkg which /usr/local/include/diagnostics.h
> >> /usr/local/include/diagnostics.h was installed by package
> binutils-2.37_2,1
> >>
> >> We have /usr/local/include early in the include list on FreeBSD to pick
> up some
> >> of the required libraries installed as packages. I will check for a
> package
> >> update or I revisit the build flags to see how it can be handled.
> > Huh, diagnostics.h is an internal header file, I don't think binutils
> > packages should ship it.  I just looked up, and Ubuntu and Arch packages
> > ship it as well... sigh.
>
> Ah, that is awkward as removing it from shipped packages is something we
> cannot
> reach back and fix.
>

And it could be in other packaging systems. Mays, Cyg

>
Admittedly not checking but is this header installed as part of make
install? I wouldn't think anyone would package something not installed.

>
> Rename diagnostics.h?
>

Works but rather awful.

Is it worth a check it's installed and there's a conflict?

--joel

>
> Chris
>