From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18034 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2013 14:49:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 18018 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2013 14:49:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-vb0-f54.google.com) (209.85.212.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:49:17 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so450831vba.13 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:49:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.115.20 with SMTP id g20mr86852705vcq.31.1357656556371; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:49:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.23.197 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:49:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130108144601.GB27385@adacore.com> References: <20130104041232.GA3567@adacore.com> <20130105075300.GG3567@adacore.com> <20130105145213.GK3567@adacore.com> <20130106070008.GL3567@adacore.com> <20130108081042.GR3567@adacore.com> <20130108144601.GB27385@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb From: David Edelsohn To: Arnaud Charlet Cc: Joel Brobecker , Tristan Gingold , Tom Tromey , David Taylor , binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > We haven't done any work to support TLS in gnu as/ld on AIX (other > than ignore these sections for now to avoid generating hard errors), so > enabling TLS in GCC would indeed cause some troubles, although we don't > use TLS directly in GNAT. Okay. If there is no direct use of TLS in GNAT, then testing with the new support would not provide any additional feedback and sanity checks of the support. Thanks, David