From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-39852-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28249 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2011 22:09:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 28238 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2011 22:09:57 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.67)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:09:40 +0000
Received: from wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.101])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p8QM9cD5005194	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:09:38 -0700
Received: from gyb11 (gyb11.prod.google.com [10.243.49.75])	by wpaz37.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p8QM8pL1027897	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT)	for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:09:37 -0700
Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so5410563gyb.29        for <gdb@sourceware.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.3.29 with SMTP id f29mr2855887ani.86.1317074976846;        Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.3.29 with SMTP id f29mr2855883ani.86.1317074976717; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.249.7 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEG7qUy+1xUJrA-=15V_5MN9weACajQF1RQZt8V6c4a6SkE49w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEG7qUy+1xUJrA-=15V_5MN9weACajQF1RQZt8V6c4a6SkE49w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:09:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAHACq4r6C_cMuSV9Sx72ZNSqEPex_KmGNaLBe95cw6W_cZ+_og@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Differences between gdb-index as generated by Gold and GDB itself
From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com>
To: Sterling Augustine <saugustine@google.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2

> Examining the gdb-index--as produced by GDB--shows an inconsistency
> between enumerator names inside a namespace vs outside the namespace:
>
> foo::B::B_B
> vs
> B_B

You mean:

foo::B::B_B
vs.
A_A

Right?

> That is, the enumerator inside the namespace includes the enum name,
> but the enumerator outside the namespace doesn't include the enum
> name. Is this a bug in GDB?

-cary