public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vaibhav kurhe <vaibhav.kurhe@gmail.com>
To: "Zaric, Zoran (Zare)" <Zoran.Zaric@amd.com>
Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Re: GDB | DWARF expression | Extracting a range of bits from an 'xmm' register
Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 02:39:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHKv1qscHZdAY1X7y6y1UdP6TMrV4=bSBdEMffe1T57fvX2WUw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4319e88e-4f22-fce6-8678-07e27fb043d4@amd.com>

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:36 PM Zaric, Zoran (Zare) via Gdb
<gdb@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> On 5/21/21 3:03 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> > * vaibhav kurhe via Gdb <gdb@sourceware.org> [2021-05-21 14:27:15 +0530]:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >> For a use case, I am trying to build a DWARF expression which represents
> >> the value of an arbitrary range of bits (e.g. 96-127 bits) in an *128-bit
> >> xmm register* to be used as a *location attribute value* for a variable DIE.
> >> I am using GDB to consume the debug info and test it.
> >>
> >> Following is the expression I started with to test out a shift operation on
> >> an 128-bit xmm0 register using Typed DWARF stack :-
> >>
> >> *"DW_OP_GNU_regval_type: 21 (xmm0) <0x30>; DW_OP_GNU_const_type: <0x30>  16
> >> byte block: 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; DW_OP_shl;
> >
> > I'm probably just not understanding correctly, but I'm confused by the
> > use of DW_OP_GNU_const_type.  Isn't this providing the number of bits
> > to shift?  I'd have expected something like 'DW_OP_const1u 96'.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
> >
>
> Hi Vaibhav,
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but what is the end goal that you are
> trying to accomplish?
>
> The way how you formed your expression, you can only get a read only
> stack value location description.
>
> Why not use the DW_OP_bit_piece with your register being the only piece
> inside of it and then use that as your end location description?
>
> Thanks,
> Zoran

Hi Zoran,
Thanks for the reply!

Actually I am trying to improve an object file's debug info in case of
a vectorized transformation by the compiler.
e.g. when a source variable, 'sum' = (xmm0[0-31] + xmm0[32-63] +
xmm0[64-95] + xmm0[96-127]).

Thanks for pointing out the DW_OP_bit_piece operation! It worked in a
setting where a source variable resides directly in a 32-bit chunk of
an 128-bit xmm register.
But, I think it won't be possible for the above example(?).
Here, we'll have to do 128-bit operations (such as DW_OP_shl) on the
register to get its 32-bit chunks. Is that correct?

Regards,
Vaibhav

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-21  8:57 vaibhav kurhe
2021-05-21 14:03 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-05-21 16:02   ` Zaric, Zoran (Zare)
2021-05-21 21:09     ` vaibhav kurhe [this message]
2021-05-24 10:00       ` Zaric, Zoran (Zare)
2021-05-21 20:37   ` vaibhav kurhe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHKv1qscHZdAY1X7y6y1UdP6TMrV4=bSBdEMffe1T57fvX2WUw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=vaibhav.kurhe@gmail.com \
    --cc=Zoran.Zaric@amd.com \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).