From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16185 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2011 02:07:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 16125 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Nov 2011 02:07:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-gy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.160.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 02:07:13 +0000 Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so3623860gyg.0 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.169.33 with SMTP id ab1mr16927912igc.0.1320458831232; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:07:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.19.1 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 19:06:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111101201247.GA19887@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <4EA89365.2010807@web.de> <4EAED7DC.5030805@siemens.com> <4EB010D1.9050209@web.de> <20111101201247.GA19887@host1.jankratochvil.net> From: Vimal Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 02:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Multiple breakpoint issue when debugging loadable kernel module To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Jan Kiszka , Tom Tromey , gdb@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 Oops, somehow missed this thread. On 1 November 2011 14:12, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > It reminds me a binutils bug, maybe you could check your > /path/to/some/module.ko with readelf if it has its .debug_ranges right: > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D714824#c6 > > Sure it also may be a completely different bug and it may really be in GD= B. As I am not experienced enough with this, would love some more pointers. Are you suggesting gcc does not insert debug information correctly? Though this is possible, does it explain the fact that the same .ko file without recompilation, works with gdb-7.1? --=20 Vimal