From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 77302 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2015 16:13:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 77284 invoked by uid 89); 13 Mar 2015 16:13:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-ob0-f181.google.com Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f181.google.com) (209.85.214.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:13:21 +0000 Received: by obcwp4 with SMTP id wp4so20702859obc.4; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:13:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.78.72 with SMTP id z8mr38770690oew.13.1426263200025; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:13:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.134.102 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:13:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <550318C90200007800069E5B@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <550318C90200007800069E5B@mail.emea.novell.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: Add support for SHF_COMPRESSED From: "H.J. Lu" To: Jan Beulich Cc: Binutils , GDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 13.03.15 at 16:31, wrote: >> I am working on SHF_COMPRESSED support: >> >> http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.sheader.html >> >> We already have .zdebug* sections, which aren't compatible >> with SHF_COMPRESSED scheme due to missing compression >> header. What section names should we use for SHF_COMPRESSED >> debug sections. Using .debug* or .zdebug* will break existing tools. >> I am thinking .zlibdebug* or ..Zdebug*. Any suggestions? > > Why would they need to have different names anyway? They're > distinguishable by the flag. Won't the exiting tools, like GDB, choke on compressed .debug* sections? -- H.J.