From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D79A83887007 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:23:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D79A83887007 Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id 72so262358otc.3 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:23:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7wpIwQWztIILG2arCFAANykagR2rVimMDihSv6wcGM0=; b=qj+q1cPuCf0Cc9xtBZDEvHJ7plPbfjtSTBsWGQWtRT3VATrAYzCj+9ic/s6p2L1NqE bHq6AGft/pSWdLtZHDGRRAwuoPJBiXCtKdU6OZTsVo+GGn0TFhSq3h9KzckhE/9hx5EY pF56pyuajumLSt2G0ZZyprplOovL16IaFT+jLSU83GiRWkqp7fJnfQgdsU8Bb0/4Y2HH QW211iGOvEGsi8a6TC7mgH9fA6rhwzE1kCa/gEJxBtFTHkCLmCRw1OncCuksQu+4tC20 MgIUjuUjB3uVlF5m1Sg5agJNnfFpapFcnYnge80lS2sVGFF6C9FLyREZmh0vDAgznRGs 0kFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532NOAZbGPTj2c5UDXr2x8PewmL+aBFn/ykpj1zmqv6aWKNeupg4 qq0GV8d73ojHohvXtiyARinnemh5jTLK54yHP4iK5YiL X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiM2ECWgrq7wMqJCR9p+OTtxKhTcyoygGeCOj2FWqi3b3bsU6hGHRZwOTvUvNtJfdiWexGjGa/+V3r3CUzHQk= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6c54:: with SMTP id g20mr26283713otq.120.1595366596246; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:23:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Reuben Thomas Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 22:23:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Remote protocol question: the documentation says '?' is not required, but maybe it is? To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Christo Crause , Reuben Thomas via Gdb X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:23:18 -0000 On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 22:19, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020, Reuben Thomas wrote: > > > Just to eliminate this source of potential error, I adjusted my stub so > > that when it first connects to gdb it does not send a packet. This does > not > > change the exchange with gdb in any way, except that the first packet > from > > the stub is not sent. > > Well, this corrects an actual protocol error. Indeed, and another version of gdb (or another debugger) might not be so lenient. -- https://rrt.sc3d.org