From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20054 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2003 16:01:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20045 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2003 16:01:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.bostream.com) (213.79.144.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2003 16:01:55 -0000 Received: from lgh163a.kemisten.nu (lgh163a.kemisten.nu [212.32.172.173]) by mail.bostream.com (8.12.4/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h5EG1rWT134688; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 18:01:54 +0200 (MEST) Received: from ams by lgh163a.kemisten.nu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19RDTT-0004TO-00; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 18:01:51 +0200 From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" To: Jeroen Dekkers CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com CC: kettenis@gnu.org In-reply-to: <20030529131545.GA458@pc-jeroen> (message from Jeroen Dekkers on Thu, 29 May 2003 15:15:46 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix GNU/Hurd build error References: <20030529131545.GA458@pc-jeroen> Message-Id: Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:01:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2 This is the second time I have pinged about this patch (last ping was on June 10th, the actual patch was sent on May 29th). Does anyone in GDB world actualy care about GNU? Because it sure doesn't look like it; two weeks for an obvious fix is not acceptable...