From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29776 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2003 17:18:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27230 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2003 17:17:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.bostream.com) (213.79.144.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2003 17:17:46 -0000 Received: from lgh163a.kemisten.nu (lgh163a.kemisten.nu [212.32.172.173]) by mail.bostream.com (8.12.4/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h5EHHiWT225167; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 19:17:44 +0200 (MEST) Received: from ams by lgh163a.kemisten.nu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19REes-0004Wh-00; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 19:17:42 +0200 From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030614161900.GA6388@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:19:00 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix GNU/Hurd build error References: <20030529131545.GA458@pc-jeroen> <20030614161900.GA6388@nevyn.them.org> Message-Id: Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 17:18:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 No, judging from the response apparently no one in the GDB world cares about GNU. GDB's response time to patches is slow; live with it instead of placing demands upon volunteers. Placing demands on volunteers is reasonable if there is a patch out, and if the patch looks OK, since commiting something takes no time at all. But thats just my opinion. The patch looks reasonable, so I have checked it in. Thanks.