From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27544 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2003 20:07:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27472 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2003 20:07:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.bostream.com) (213.79.144.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2003 20:07:14 -0000 Received: from lgh163a.kemisten.nu (lgh163a.kemisten.nu [212.32.172.173]) by mail.bostream.com (8.12.4/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h5EK7CWT173850; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 22:07:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: from ams by lgh163a.kemisten.nu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19RHIr-0004j0-00; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 22:07:09 +0200 From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" To: Andrew Cagney CC: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3EEB5D0B.6010409@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sat, 14 Jun 2003 13:36:11 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix GNU/Hurd build error References: <20030529131545.GA458@pc-jeroen> <20030614161900.GA6388@nevyn.them.org> <3EEB5D0B.6010409@redhat.com> Message-Id: Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 20:07:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 The important thing here is to ensure that the problem is fixed in the next release. That was being done. You your self quoted the GNU Coding Standard with this nice part: > When you receive bug reports, keep in mind that bug reports are > crucial for your work. If you don't know about problems, you > cannot fix them. So always thank each person who sends a bug > report. I prefer to see the "thank you" messages to bug reports as acknowledgements that the bug report has been noted into someone list of things todo. Since nobody did that, I assumed that the bug report was dumped into /dev/null the first time around, and just ignored the second. Anyway, lets stop this unproductive crap since the bug is fixed. :-) Cheers.