From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10857 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2003 13:06:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10850 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2003 13:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ns2.dialtelecom.sk) (81.0.192.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2003 13:06:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 25072 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2003 13:05:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pcw2k69.energoinfo.sk) (81.0.194.199) by ns2.dialtelecom.sk with SMTP; 18 Jul 2003 13:05:33 -0000 Received: from main by pcw2k69.energoinfo.sk with local (MasqMail 0.1.16) id 19dUv7-5K5-00 for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:05:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:06:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Terminally slow (75 seconds) on some steps To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: INLINE References: <1057999221.6815.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com> <3F16D022.30209@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3F16D022.30209@redhat.com> From: Robert Vazan X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.51 (Python 2.1.3 on Linux/i686) X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00238.txt.bz2 On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:34:42 -0400 Andrew Cagney wrote: > Is this a threaded program on GNU/Linux? 5.3 contained a major > performance improvement for threaded debugging. Threads are only planned. There is a lot of locks, but only one thread. > Also, something from April '02 is seriously old. Try either 5.3, or a > 6.0 snap (see http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/download/) I have here Cvs HEAD and it gives 68->11 seconds improvement. It still isn't the same as outside debugger, but it's usable, especially because single-stepping is faster too.