From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-19788-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28190 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2004 14:50:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28182 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2004 14:50:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.111.177)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2004 14:50:40 -0000
Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
	 Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:50:18 +0100
From: "Dave Korn" <dk@artimi.com>
To: "'Bob Rossi'" <bob@brasko.net>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: probing GDB for MI versions
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:38:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20041007143716.GB14402@white>
Message-ID: <NUTMEGOjcdEc83LUEM7000002fa@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2004 14:50:18.0376 (UTC) FILETIME=[F6715080:01C4AC7C]
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 'Bob Rossi'
> Sent: 07 October 2004 15:37

> I understand that adding an MI command to the MI function set that can
> not be accessed by a front end that understands the MI protocol is
> nonsensical and confusing

  Since nobody has proposed such an addition, your opinion of it is utterly
irrelevant.

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....