public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris.Pedley@arm.com
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 6.0 Branch and ARM Multithreading Support
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:33:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF51472554.F81ED3E5-ON80256D98.004984AC-80256D98.004A676B@cambridge.arm.com> (raw)


On 01/09/2003 17:25:01 gdb-owner wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 11:31:36AM +0100, Chris.Pedley@arm.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've cross compiled the GDB 6.0 branch for ARM Linux (host=arm-linux
>> target=arm-linux build=i686-linux) and can't get it to debug a
>> multithreaded program.  Attempting to debug a program that creates a
thread
>> results in:
>>
>> Program received signal SIG32, Real-time event 32.
>> 0x0000f2c0 in __sigsuspend (set=0xbffffc9c)
>> ...
>>
>> I've linked the program statically against unstripped libraries as I am
>> aware that people have had trouble debugging multithreaded applications
>> using a stripped pthread library.
>>
>> Any suggestions as to what is wrong?
>
>Does it display any messages about loading libthread_db?  Does it
>successfully map the library?

I don't get any messages about loading libthread_db, the only worrying
message is GDB starts up with:
"Symbol `PC' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking"

The test application presumably doesn't need to map libthread_db because
its linked statically?  cat /proc/<gdb pid>/maps includes:
0212000-40216000 r-xp 00000000 1f:02 8751864
/usr/lib/libthread_db-1.0.so
40216000-4021a000 ---p 00004000 1f:02 8751864
/usr/lib/libthread_db-1.0.so
4021a000-4021f000 rw-p 00000000 1f:02 8751864
/usr/lib/libthread_db-1.0.so

(By the way - call getpid() in gdb resulted in "Program received signal
SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.")

>I tested native thread debugging on ARM recently (~ week ago) and it
>worked.  If you are using glibc 2.3.2 you will need the patch I sent to
>this list and libc-alpha a week or two ago.

The library I'm building against, and in my ARM Linux filesystem are both
glibc 2.3.  Does this need patching?

Thanks,
Chris

--
Chris Pedley,  Graduate Engineer
Intellectual Property Solutions Division
ARM Ltd, 110 Fulbourn Rd, Cambridge CB1 9NJ UK
Tel : +44 1223 400847     Fax: +44 1223 400410


             reply	other threads:[~2003-09-05 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-05 13:33 Chris.Pedley [this message]
2003-09-05 13:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-01 10:31 Chris.Pedley
2003-09-01 16:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OF51472554.F81ED3E5-ON80256D98.004984AC-80256D98.004A676B@cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=chris.pedley@arm.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).