public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris.Pedley@arm.com
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Cross Compiling GDB
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OFAA40B82A.C4DA0D7A-ON80256D88.0032399F-80256D88.003357BA@cambridge.arm.com> (raw)


On 19/08/2003 19:31:05 gdb-owner wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 02:00:37PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:43:05PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> >On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 06:40:12PM +0100, Chris.Pedley@arm.com wrote:
>> >>Is it actually possible to cross compile GDB for anything other than
>> >>cygwin.  In the output from ./configure when trying to configure for
>> >>cross compiling using the GNU ARM tools I get the message: configure:
>> >>cross-compiling for a non-cygwin target is not supported
>> >>
>> >>Also, can anyone confirm to me what the exact definitions of host,
>> >>target and build are when passed to ./configure?
>> >>
>> >>Thanks.
>> >
>> >It sounds like you're using the Cygwin sources for GDB.  If you're not
>> >building a Cygwin-targeted GDB, don't do that - or direct comments to
>> >the cygwin list.
>>
>> "Cygwin sources for gdb"?  The sources for cygwin's gdb are the same as
>> for any other platform.
>
>If so I apologize, but I swear I've heard of local patches from the
>cygwin people before.  Maybe I was thinking of another tool?
>
>In any case, that error message doesn't come from the FSF sources
>anywhere.
>
>--
>Daniel Jacobowitz
>MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

I presume that the GDB at the following location isn't cygwin specific?
ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/gdb-5.3.tar.gz

However, if you look at line 53 in gdb-5.3/readline/configure.in then
it issues the error given above if cross compiling for a non-cygwin
target.

Also my questions about build, host and target have been raised
because I'm unsure about the check for a cross compiler at line 123
in gdb-5.3/configure.in.  This checks whether the host and target
are the same thing, and only assumes it is a cross compiler if they
are different.  Why isn't this actually checking build and host?

Thanks.

--
Chris Pedley,  Graduate Engineer
Intellectual Property Solutions Division
ARM Ltd, 110 Fulbourn Rd, Cambridge CB1 9NJ UK
Tel : +44 1223 400847     Fax: +44 1223 400410


             reply	other threads:[~2003-08-20  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-20  9:21 Chris.Pedley [this message]
2003-08-20 13:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-20 14:17 Chris.Pedley
2003-08-20 14:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-20 13:28 Chris.Pedley
2003-08-20 13:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-19 17:40 Chris.Pedley
2003-08-19 17:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-19 18:00   ` Christopher Faylor
2003-08-19 18:31     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-19 20:56       ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OFAA40B82A.C4DA0D7A-ON80256D88.0032399F-80256D88.003357BA@cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=chris.pedley@arm.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).