public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
	binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Partial autoconf transition thoughts
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030611210428.7397D-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <orfzmgpk3j.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On 11 Jun 2003, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> >  Agreed, as long as there is a way to have $host_alias and $target_alias
> > set up as desired. 
> 
> We (toplevel, not autoconf) call them $host_noncanonical and
> $target_noncanonical now.  autoconf no longer provides this feature.

 It's good we do that, but it's bad autoconf does not.  Any reasonable
justification?

> > $ locate libbfd-2.13.2.1.so
> > /usr/i386-linux/mips64el-linux/lib/libbfd-2.13.2.1.so
> > /usr/i386-linux/mipsel-linux/lib/libbfd-2.13.2.1.so
> > /usr/lib/libbfd-2.13.2.1.so
> 
> > Where does that "i386-linux" above come from, then?
> 
> Seems like an artifact of your install.  I don't think we use host in
> install pathnames by default.

 Well, see how AM_INSTALL_LIBBFD is defined. ;-)  There was a discussion
last year...

> >  Well, this is probably an option, but I don't know why such a
> > complication necessary.
> 
> It's necessary because of changes in autoconf that make the
> propagation of command-line flags from build to host and host to
> target not easily available.  If we want to avoid using the

 Why is that so?  I am looking at what autoconf does right now and I can
see that $ac_cv_host_alias is set to $ac_cv_build_alias if $host_alias is
empty and $ac_cv_target_alias is set to ac_cv_host_alias if $target_alias
is empty.  Why can't the same be done for $host_alias and $target_alias at
the same place?  I hope not for the lone reason of differing between
implied and user-specified values -- it can be trivially be done
differently and more explicitly => cleanlier. 

> canonicalized names, which we do, using the macros written by
> Nathanael is pretty much the only way to go.

 That's a reasonable approach for now, but why can't autoconf be fixed
ultimately? 

> > Have you seen the dependency graphs I sent yesterday?  I believe my
> > proposal is the simplest solution.
> 
> I believe Nathanael's macros are the implementation of the solution.
> BTW, we already use them.  See config/acx.m4.

 Indeed, but I would prefer to see it done in autoconf so that it need not
be repeated locally elsewhere.

-- 
+  Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland   +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+        e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available        +

  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-11 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-10  0:40 Nathanael Nerode
2003-06-10  0:59 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-10 10:59   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-10 11:38     ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-10 12:45       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-10 22:06     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-11 11:32       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-11 18:04         ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-11 19:39           ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2003-06-11 20:39             ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-12 11:21               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-12 12:10                 ` Bernd Jendrissek
2003-06-12 12:26                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-12 21:42                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-13 10:35                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-13 14:02                         ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-13 18:32                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-13 19:25                             ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-13 20:15                               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-13 20:54                                 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-14 14:33                                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-14 15:43                                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-14 18:27                                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-06-26  7:24                                         ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-28  0:35                                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-10  1:40 Nathanael Nerode
2003-06-10  1:46 ` DJ Delorie
2003-06-09 22:02 Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-09 22:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-09 22:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-06-09 23:14   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-10  0:44     ` Alexandre Oliva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.3.96.1030611210428.7397D-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl \
    --to=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
    --cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=neroden@twcny.rr.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).