* Odd, ptrace_getregs
@ 2000-03-13 8:55 Daniel Berlin
2000-03-13 10:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Daniel Berlin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2000-03-13 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
I was just generating some diffs, and noticed this:
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/configure,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -r1.11 configure
3737c3737
< echo "$ac_t""$gdb_cv_have_ptrace_geregs" 1>&6
---
> echo "$ac_t""$gdb_cv_have_ptrace_getregs" 1>&6
I wonder if this is causing problems for anyone, because it's *definitely*
wrong
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Odd, ptrace_getregs
2000-03-13 8:55 Odd, ptrace_getregs Daniel Berlin
@ 2000-03-13 10:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2000-03-13 23:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Mark Kettenis
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Daniel Berlin
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2000-03-13 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dan; +Cc: gdb
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 08:55:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
I was just generating some diffs, and noticed this:
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/configure,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -r1.11 configure
3737c3737
< echo "$ac_t""$gdb_cv_have_ptrace_geregs" 1>&6
---
> echo "$ac_t""$gdb_cv_have_ptrace_getregs" 1>&6
I wonder if this is causing problems for anyone, because it's *definitely*
wrong
I was silently hoping nobody would notice :-(. I corrected a typo in
configure.in, but forgot to run autoconf before checking it in. It's
basically harmless since it is only the printing of the value that's
broken. I just hoped that someone would find the need to regenerate
configure soon. Feel free to check in a regenerated autoconf.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Odd, ptrace_getregs
2000-03-13 10:33 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2000-03-13 23:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Mark Kettenis
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-03-13 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: dan, gdb
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I was silently hoping nobody would notice :-(. I corrected a typo in
> configure.in, but forgot to run autoconf before checking it in. It's
> basically harmless since it is only the printing of the value that's
> broken. I just hoped that someone would find the need to regenerate
> configure soon. Feel free to check in a regenerated autoconf.
Have a look for the fateful phrase ``Fix typo.'' in the ChangeLogs :-)
It should make you feel like you're not alone :-)
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Odd, ptrace_getregs
2000-03-13 23:06 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2000-04-01 0:00 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2000-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: dan, gdb
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I was silently hoping nobody would notice :-(. I corrected a typo in
> configure.in, but forgot to run autoconf before checking it in. It's
> basically harmless since it is only the printing of the value that's
> broken. I just hoped that someone would find the need to regenerate
> configure soon. Feel free to check in a regenerated autoconf.
Have a look for the fateful phrase ``Fix typo.'' in the ChangeLogs :-)
It should make you feel like you're not alone :-)
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Odd, ptrace_getregs
2000-03-13 10:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2000-03-13 23:06 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2000-04-01 0:00 ` Mark Kettenis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2000-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dan; +Cc: gdb
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 08:55:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
I was just generating some diffs, and noticed this:
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/configure,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -r1.11 configure
3737c3737
< echo "$ac_t""$gdb_cv_have_ptrace_geregs" 1>&6
---
> echo "$ac_t""$gdb_cv_have_ptrace_getregs" 1>&6
I wonder if this is causing problems for anyone, because it's *definitely*
wrong
I was silently hoping nobody would notice :-(. I corrected a typo in
configure.in, but forgot to run autoconf before checking it in. It's
basically harmless since it is only the printing of the value that's
broken. I just hoped that someone would find the need to regenerate
configure soon. Feel free to check in a regenerated autoconf.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Odd, ptrace_getregs
2000-03-13 8:55 Odd, ptrace_getregs Daniel Berlin
2000-03-13 10:33 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2000-04-01 0:00 ` Daniel Berlin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Berlin @ 2000-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
I was just generating some diffs, and noticed this:
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/configure,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -r1.11 configure
3737c3737
< echo "$ac_t""$gdb_cv_have_ptrace_geregs" 1>&6
---
> echo "$ac_t""$gdb_cv_have_ptrace_getregs" 1>&6
I wonder if this is causing problems for anyone, because it's *definitely*
wrong
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-04-01 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-03-13 8:55 Odd, ptrace_getregs Daniel Berlin
2000-03-13 10:33 ` Mark Kettenis
2000-03-13 23:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Mark Kettenis
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Daniel Berlin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).