From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-22212-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 15760 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2005 15:15:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 15746 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2005 15:15:33 -0000
Received: from pluton.ispras.ru (HELO pluton.ispras.ru) (83.149.199.253)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with SMTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:15:33 +0000
Received: (qmail 18834 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2005 15:12:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO truba.ispras.ru) (83.149.198.41)
  by pluton.ispras.ru with SMTP; 14 Jul 2005 15:12:00 -0000
Received: from truba.ispras.ru (root@localhost)
	by truba.ispras.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j6EEsxXd011007
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:54:59 +0400
Received: from ispserv.ispras.ru (ispserv [83.149.198.72])
	by truba.ispras.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6EEsxwU011001
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:54:59 +0400
Received: from ispserv.ispras.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ispserv.ispras.ru (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j6EF0kwg004104
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:00:46 +0400
Received: from localhost (kostik@localhost)
	by ispserv.ispras.ru (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id j6EF0kWU004100
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 19:00:46 +0400
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:15:00 -0000
From: Konstantin Karganov <kostik@ispras.ru>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Incorrect breakpoint diagnostics in MI
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0507141801580.29233-100000@ispserv.ispras.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0507141852300.29233-100000@ispserv.ispras.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release
  SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release
X-Spamtest-Info: Pass through
X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2

Hello.

Playing with MI breakpoint commands I found the following thing:
Only "-break-after" and "-break-condition" correctly report the error if 
the breakpoint doesn't exist. While other commands report "^done".

(gdb)
-break-after 123 123
&"No breakpoint number 123.\n"
^error,msg="No breakpoint number 123."
(gdb)
-break-enable 123
~"No breakpoint number 123.\n"
^done
(gdb)
-break-disable 123
~"No breakpoint number 123.\n"
^done
(gdb)
-break-delete 123
~"No breakpoint number 123.\n"
^done

The diagnostics goes to console output, that is possibly not visible to FE 
user and the result itself is "ok".

Is it a bug?

Best reagards,
Konstantin.