From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23441 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2005 03:43:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23428 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2005 03:43:37 -0000 Received: from ausmtp01.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp01.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.186) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:43:37 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp01.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6S3jsSX042176 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:45:58 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.237]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j6S3k7gD181988 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:46:10 +1000 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6S3hA5R024031 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:43:11 +1000 Received: from wks190494wss.cn.ibm.com (wks190494wss.cn.ibm.com [9.181.134.203]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6S3h6Ch023958; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:43:08 +1000 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:43:00 -0000 From: Wu Zhou X-X-Sender: woodzltc@localhost.localdomain To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: kamaraju@gmail.com, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: gfortran - gdb problem In-Reply-To: <20050726130615.GA5111@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: References: <20050725130929.GA2090@nevyn.them.org> <20050726031703.GA25841@nevyn.them.org> <20050726130615.GA5111@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00259.txt.bz2 On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 04:47:11AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote: > > IMHO, the case insensitive lookup might be the long-term resolution. What > > about define "strcmp" as an macro of "strcasecmp" if case_sensitive is > > false? This might seems ugly, but it should help here. > > You should take a look at the symbol table structures first - it's not > that simple. Most of it is hashed case-sensitively. Yes. You are right. I run to this point too fast. What about the other method you suggested: to lower case based on CU language when reading in the symbol table? If it is okay, maybe I can try to code a patch on this. Elena, what is your idea on this? Daniel said that you might have better idea. Regards - Wu Zhou