From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-10029-listarch-gdb=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12078 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2002 14:49:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12066 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2002 14:49:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO TheWorld.com) (199.172.62.105)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2002 14:49:32 -0000
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (wgarmil@shell01.TheWorld.com [199.172.62.241])
	by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA32435;
	Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:49:31 -0400
Received: from localhost (qqi@localhost)
	by shell.TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA80106807;
	Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:49:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell01.TheWorld.com: qqi owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:49:00 -0000
From: Quality Quorum <qqi@theworld.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>, <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions
In-Reply-To: <20020823142704.GA17903@nevyn.them.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.40.0208231048490.79388274-100000@shell01.TheWorld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2



On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0400, Quality Quorum wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> > > Lets get rid of the easy one (...) `Hg':
> > >
> > > ``
> > >
> > > @item @code{Hg}@var{id} --- set general thread
> > > @cindex @code{Hc} packet
> > >
> > > Select the general thread.  Register and memory read and write
> > > operations apply to the most recently selected general thread.
> >
> >
> > ????? Memory is shared between threads, isn't it so ????
> >
> > IMHO, a multi-process debugging is a very different animal from a
> > multi-thread debugging and lumping them together only creates more
> > problems.
>
> Registers aren't, though.

??? It seems to me that  I was not talking about registers ???

>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>

Thanks,

Aleksey