From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Nick Duffek <nsd@redhat.com>, insight@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, fnasser@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Register group proposal
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:59:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010222105511.1660T-100000@is>
References: <3A942228.C9E05495@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00289.html

On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> I guess this is called as something like (I'll take the liberty of using
> slightly different names):
> 
> 	for (regnum = REGGROUP_FIRST_REGNUM (reggroup);
> 	     regnum >= 0;
> 	     retnum = REGGROUP_NEXT_REGNUM (reggroup, regnum))
> 	  {
> 	     apply regnum;
> 	  }

If we are to use an iterator, shouldn't the test in this loop be
abstracted as well, like this, for instance?

 	for (regnum = REGGROUP_FIRST_REGNUM (reggroup);
 	     REGGROUP_NOT_LAST_REGNUM (reggroup);
 	     regnum = REGGROUP_NEXT_REGNUM (reggroup, regnum))
 	  {
 	     apply regnum;
 	  }