From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15223 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2005 14:59:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15190 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2005 14:59:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM) (217.40.213.68) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2005 14:59:10 -0000 Received: from mace ([192.168.1.25]) by SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:58:45 +0000 From: "Dave Korn" To: "'Bob Rossi'" , "'Eli Zaretskii'" Cc: Subject: RE: patch review time Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:59:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20050304142600.GA2419@white> Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2005 14:58:45.0603 (UTC) FILETIME=[A9E90330:01C520CA] X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 ----Original Message---- >From: Bob Rossi >Sent: 04 March 2005 14:26 > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 09:33:25AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:00:22 -0500 >>> From: Bob Rossi >>> >>> I understand that people are busy, which is the very reason my patches >>> take so long to create. However, from my perspective it simply takes to >>> long, to get patch reviews done, except of course doco reviews from Eli >>> :). >> >> I think I generally review all patches within my responsibility and/or >> area of expertise with the same speed, not only the doco ones. > > I think you are missing the point here Eli. As an outsider of the GDB > project I am complaining that I can't make a significant contribution to > GDB because of patch review time. Bob, perhaps it would help if you posted links to any outstanding patches for which you are awaiting review? cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....