From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1E03857C70 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:26:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org AF1E03857C70 Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BAF335C3F; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:26:11 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, andrew.burgess@embecosm.com Subject: Re: sim: replacing ChangeLog files with online git logs Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sourceware.org, andrew.burgess@embecosm.com References: <83ft0zjys1.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfarhwjq.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83lfarhwjq.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:26:15 -0000 On 13 Mar 2021 18:02, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 10:12:40 -0500 > > From: Mike Frysinger > > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, andrew.burgess@embecosm.com > > > > On 13 Mar 2021 09:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 21:53:54 -0500 > > > > From: Mike Frysinger via Gdb > > > > > > > > we're planning on dropping ChangeLog files in sim/ and replacing > > > > them with a pointer to the online vcs log. > > > > > > Will the release tarballs include the generated ChangeLog file? If > > > not, why not? > > > > we can, but we're leaning towards not because they don't seem to be > > providing any actual value for people. > > So people who don't have Git will be left without the logs? I'm not > sure I'm okay with that. what value are people actually pulling from these ? we aren't talking about user-focused NEWS, we're talking about developer-focused ChangeLog. > Producing a ChangeLog from Git log when the release is tarred is not > hard, why skip it? the hard & bikeshed part is what form does the log take. do you just want the default `git log` output ? -mike