From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B1D385C403; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 20:18:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 67B1D385C403 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 16:18:22 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger To: Andrew Burgess Cc: binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Maintenance of top-level files Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Burgess , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <20210908082349.GC1487362@embecosm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YmMOBtNvOjUL+e7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210908082349.GC1487362@embecosm.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 20:18:27 -0000 --YmMOBtNvOjUL+e7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08 Sep 2021 09:23, Andrew Burgess wrote: > I wonder what the policy is these days regarding how the top level > files are maintained, e.g. Makefile.def and configure.ac? >=20 > I know once upon a time these files were maintained in the gcc > repository and then back-ported periodically to binutils-gdb, however, > as far as I can see the last attempt to sync from gcc was this commit: >=20 > commit f948b2de97884bfb4e5fc11d40a6bea9e0b096ae > Date: Wed May 29 12:43:42 2019 +0100 >=20 > Sync top level files with versions from gcc. >=20 > Which was over 2 years ago. This commit was then quickly reverted: >=20 > commit e3f56a99f66298bb505d0426950b9716a853a5df > Date: Thu May 30 11:17:19 2019 +0100 >=20 > Revert "Sync top level files with versions from gcc." >=20 > Since then there's been 30+ patches to the top level files. >=20 > My question then, is what are peoples thoughts on how these files > should be managed? Are we going to try and get back in step with gcc? > Or are we happy to continue to diverging? afaik, it's still "gcc first". when i commit changes to the top-level file= s, it's the same git commit (using `git am`), not a blank "sync files". i thi= nk a bunch of the other ones are the same way. https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=3Dgcc.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3D17af39e1c0e590f4cb13d67= 2c9ee850e871164ab https://sourceware.org/git/?p=3Dbinutils-gdb.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3D9cc11ab5bf1= 0c6f7494f6015769cf81b6988317f -mike --YmMOBtNvOjUL+e7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAmE5Go4ACgkQQWM7n+g3 9YHtzRAAygnZkgKXvPAKWLzNsRDb2Tz9PhAw5AYNpOKMfZnzf1B06tMwZ38qXXCz TcaSvnvifqLeIELatt8dkWDbTKAn4mCJ+7R8Om5Ss5IjQ0Xxy0YMV/F4LTHgbNyv A0qPekAt9wH43wH7WhBdAxggONYCnOUHxmztYojj6fD0FaPT0IFxQT1KQm90YKsd 7hyz7KoPtlzTvq/2FVS2k1gANDUueGDwQXSO36qkEbHrjme/2N20CBLgTfN8RRKz GDiZ1w+C7wlD7fpXoBO6Sgk22mvQySnOo7Rx9UtoGRv2JxlqHM45WMtmfwic6OvY 76B3OFUu/837ywB1J1fTKchjrGza+pHaWkNw/lABE9sLy9Hg4UAxj7abRohGx2WP 9TIPM2LbeZogWW8q2UeG44t7Bp7xY19jdPV0MaK7tA6kSy/bUwyUxD5edA4rGLQ9 jr7KuKhAsk0H9Cf18ShD3I0idTVCjArgjEoUfI1LLTwFjuiJeU9OqLQsc6FdRJUR Xe24Eril8Q3tZ1A4eGHCGG1RChUTPrmOjlKNXbNL0d5AuvxPeis73CzWK4jxnEDc vkHktJWULU+Lqmt+ejShZLs8z1Padyf3N79+/CaU4aP02ydpQM7C1CLnqKJPQLo5 OF5Oq1tj1Ul9sKum8iiU4/Rsmz+shhI4+YK8ewzekOEzcKgnoJo= =wWJ9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YmMOBtNvOjUL+e7Z--