From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAF153858D33; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 08:19:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CAF153858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-563df158ecaso1307938a12.0; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:19:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1690532345; x=1691137145; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YKkbU1p68MZv3NtNNjxH/adMqSTK21oUs063Jb/HjEY=; b=sn4DS9Ce8pyHnz9S3aX/Wf9Sg/7Q4EUUg78/6kTNcYGiuILJkTaL/kkyqvJEfkDD// ZAJOKO/jdzCZre62niNzPNvPbtfQLm5LyBGtV3V9REc7vFoldh4RZu9WqEPcSUX+jHi2 XQKXd15PXKqaIUS8PC28EYqjTFlb5q/h9SbLTtAqlsdUvYgiA4O3PsOain+nSb6BAdef 9+hCWvPxQhc079CmFqySD4TCnApJLfFyRj6/M9H7G1r7YwK5nwve9g+aCsUJ4slB0Uet J2mJqexxTbYgt5Gq5F92taezz6GJhQ18MAi8ZR60xURJ1jx84bBjxNdmyW8k2oe1JaJQ m1pg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690532345; x=1691137145; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YKkbU1p68MZv3NtNNjxH/adMqSTK21oUs063Jb/HjEY=; b=DR9D+W5N22013YE23z4f5Ch0Ad+Jp3ML/f6xNegyUpHj0A7ZJRhVJfJlIP3EgHF5mY KtcmH5Yuh7lfy85J+rVIudO0Woxl85PFtYXYOd80M+keGt/nlvTGs3gcdhLba+nXNG2p rmh6kRqTzQzNJCG5Wn8QEN75Z5oggIQWQZlZo7aDHkAeUWTXDipxEECMKxYBVvug12jE OvY9XCi0j7qp5rjluZr8BWDb0Kp/KixfqKojgYEXK+jEbfDhNyI+C73p0HGa+luMREOb Ji+upET6UK45IxlzssgVq0SoD1LYVX03ym6JjN6SfRHwiKHX0kFgNt4Yg3R2vLjUSmFp 3KFg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLYE03banS4bbWg8zmqu5fBJsQPFC1pRO4kUjvivPK0em2u2IYNu wS79PagXVPC8kVHhJ7AkaLQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGjIUi59+uvxFzUqh05IW7kFJf4sK8O8Lf+vNiYng64GRgZ8yxdqdg6jiIVVmTd2FIy1qSeqw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8982:b0:263:d249:9b7 with SMTP id v2-20020a17090a898200b00263d24909b7mr1139515pjn.25.1690532344617; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from squeak.grove.modra.org (158.106.96.58.static.exetel.com.au. [58.96.106.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x16-20020a17090abc9000b00256799877ffsm2167858pjr.47.2023.07.28.01.19.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Jul 2023 01:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by squeak.grove.modra.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62E421140494; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:49:01 +0930 (ACST) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:49:01 +0930 From: Alan Modra To: Arsen =?utf-8?Q?Arsenovi=C4=87?= Cc: binutils , Gdb , Nick Clifton Subject: Re: Syncing the toplevel with the GCC tree Message-ID: References: <86lef23hcl.fsf@aarsen.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <86lef23hcl.fsf@aarsen.me> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3028.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 03:47:55PM +0200, Arsen Arsenović via Binutils wrote: > Hi there! > > I'm currently in the process of replacing the out-of-date in-tree intl > with an out-of-tree gettext. This requires modification to both the > binutils-gdb and gcc repositories, and I've noticed that some changes in > the latter haven't propagated to binutils-gdb yet. > > How does the process of syncing these trees up work? It's painful and not something I'm going to do again. Last time I did so I managed to break binutils-gdb. The process goes like this: 1) Some ports have been removed from gcc but not binutils-gdb, so firstly revert those patches to the top-level on the gcc side. 2) Copy over the gcc configury and makefiles. 3) Reapply binutils patches that haven't been applied to gcc, either because the people making the patches didn't care enough to submit them to gcc, or because the gcc maintainers didn't care enough to ack those patches. This was the list I used last time. Very likely it needs updating. Revert gcc dc832fb39fc0 2022-08-25 fc259b522c0f 2022-06-25 Reapply binutils 69961a84c9b3 2018-12-12 50ad1254d503 2021-01-09 bb368aad297f 2022-03-11 de83289ef32e 2022-04-08 e5f2f7d901ee 2022-07-26 2cac01e3ffff 2022-09-26 > I intend on synchronizing the toplevels and emailing in patches that > allow using modern gettext to all the relevant maintainers after some > further testing. > > It would also be good to synchronize ahead of the 2.41 release of > Binutils. > > Thanks in advance, have a lovely day. > -- > Arsen Arsenović -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM