From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0495A3987032 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:00:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0495A3987032 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 490051E797; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:00:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: GDB Frame Unwinding for Pure Assembly Code To: Ahmad Nouralizadeh , Jan Kratochvil Cc: "gdb@sourceware.org" References: <20200622213956.GA3486027@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20200623072654.GA3548953@host1.jankratochvil.net> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:00:57 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:01:03 -0000 On 2020-06-23 7:48 a.m., Ahmad Nouralizadeh via Gdb wrote: > Hi Jan, > Thanks for the answer! Could you tell me why is an inline unwinder used? > Regards. I'd break on / add prints to the `inline_frame_sniffer` function and see what it does. Simon