From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD49839518A8 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:56:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org AD49839518A8 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 174Hul1h003317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:56:52 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 174Hul1h003317 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FB031E79C; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:56:47 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: offlist - QNX Assignment Paperwork To: Joel Sherrill , Eli Zaretskii via Gdb References: From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 13:56:47 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:56:47 +0000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:56:54 -0000 On 2021-08-04 1:33 p.m., Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > I didn't want to post this online but QNX has changed corporate hands > at least twice over the past couple of decades. Is the assignment > paperwork still binding? > > Wikipedia shows 2004 and 2010 changes in ownership.along with some > corporate name changes. > > I honestly have no idea how any of that impacts the assignment > paperwork but wanted to ask if this is something the FSF should > comment on. > > Thanks. > > --joel > RTEMS > No idea, I'm not involved with copyright assignment processes at all (other than looking up the file). Hopefully Stephen will contact the FSF to clarify that. Simon