public inbox for gdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donny Kurniawan <donny.kurniawan@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: libGDB and gdbserver questions
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bba22c370511151531q13ef6be0j1e89d496def9432d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dlcu2c$ct1$1@sea.gmane.org>

> > "master UI controller" (that controls GDBs).
>
> I'm not sure what you mean about "master UI controller". The biggest

What I mean is the UI that is presented to the user, which manages
breakpoints, execution, stepping etc. for multiple processes.

> However, it's not likely that you have 1000 different programs. If you have

It is only one single program being run for 1000 times (1000 processes).

> two programs, and each one is run on 500 machines, you can start two copies
> of gdb.
>
> Then each copy of gdb would connect to a "redirector" you can write, that
> will basically forward all packets to invididual instances of gdbserver.
> But it will present those 500 instances as 500 threads, and gdb can work
> with threads more or less fine.

Hmmm.... I'm curious with this approach. I did write a "proxy"
redirector between gdbserver and gdb. But it only connects one
gdbserver to one gdb.

So basically with this approach (many gdbservers to one gdb), we
present processes as threads to gdb? How about debugging multi-thread
(!) program with many processes then? How do we present threads to
gdb?

It seems to me, this approach is a clean hack, but not the way it's
supposed to be.

Donny

>
> As least, that what I plan to do for multi-program debugging.
>
> - Volodya
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-15 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-15 12:48 Donny Kurniawan
2005-11-15 14:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-15 23:45   ` Donny Kurniawan
2005-11-16  0:40     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-15 15:34 ` Vladimir Prus
2005-11-15 23:31   ` Donny Kurniawan [this message]
2005-11-16  8:01     ` Vladimir Prus
2005-11-17  3:58       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-17 18:44         ` Stan Shebs
2005-11-21  8:01       ` Donny Kurniawan
2005-11-16  9:19   ` Konstantin Karganov
2005-11-21  8:04     ` Donny Kurniawan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bba22c370511151531q13ef6be0j1e89d496def9432d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=donny.kurniawan@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).