From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6303 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2005 23:45:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 6142 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2005 23:45:08 -0000 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.207) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:45:08 +0000 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n1so1741101nzf for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:45:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.224.48 with SMTP id w48mr3378422nzg; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:45:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.31.6 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:45:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:45:00 -0000 From: Donny Kurniawan To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: libGDB and gdbserver questions In-Reply-To: <20051115141835.GA21125@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051115141835.GA21125@nevyn.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2 > This isn't the problem. Extending the GDB native backend to handle > multiple processes wouldn't be hard; it's extending the user interface > and process control and breakpoint management and shared library > support and so on to handle multiple processes that is difficult. > > GDB simply doesn't support what you want to do. Yet. > I do suspect that there are some "managers" (breakpoint manager, stepping manager etc.) somewhere in GDB. Well, it can be clearly seen that the UI (text UI, curses, etc.) doesn't support multiple processes. But, from your reply (just to reconfirm), you are saying that the managers themselves are not easily extended to support multiple processes? Donny