From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com (mail-wr1-f53.google.com [209.85.221.53]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24308385780E for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:16:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 24308385780E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=palves.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alves.ped@gmail.com Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id t10so5151352wrv.1 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:16:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WbthDbIZkK231fcZ65BIEm/BU+uXt36AaYq/fweHh+E=; b=khdOU1LE1c2vVmbuhEwUXHEHZ+FV5tcHFDNRuJwqp/DwgD6/742zN0J/T2ILM0E788 Myaa2MutnqqxBE1fkkZRzeYRskyTm7hiOEbvDv6Cox6JdcdcOeI520BC2XerejmMM73P CgAOQ9J65MFTD1pLM7qMMGrD8mZSJRWPoqb/DPsifE/ts/6iqcePFx5eCmWelHe+Z3i1 Y5+cjnE/YNSEUyac5Fn39t3hofBIqBoLo7jKwhbI9cts1hzBt/sRqZv6hiZp6sfCXFlK rhZYTvPycQyIVz3W2KypeakHocUowXRh5cAajQ+vivqgVt/H3wI5c7Sq+0nd/7bW28ok WhkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PCQi/AyMacacsqb3N4SNwUqQNK0mELAQuYd8YjT+Ks+rccolM iYbkYlTwgBhrqlDJVVACPoSI5Fd/h05whg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwY5PE35zaVRg9ewvZxTj+38Oyw88zE0Xi+5bIHePDr7Ff+ZOhfiGeinmrL2zKIxFXJTLF/A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f34a:: with SMTP id e10mr3929303wrp.91.1601381787291; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f905:5600:eefd:c63:53e0:3e8a? ([2001:8a0:f905:5600:eefd:c63:53e0:3e8a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q12sm6027108wrs.48.2020.09.29.05.16.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Do we still support DICOS? To: Luis Machado , "gdb@sourceware.org" References: <14e31f08-fc7e-9539-09b9-b8bb8d37513b@linaro.org> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:16:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <14e31f08-fc7e-9539-09b9-b8bb8d37513b@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:16:30 -0000 On 9/22/20 8:01 PM, Luis Machado via Gdb wrote: > Hi, > > In the middle of discussing the usefulness of tracepoints/fast tracepoints (which should be left for another thread potentially), do we still care about DICOS? Probably not. I never heard anything again about DICOS ever since the original port work 12 years ago or some such. I was under the impression that Ericsson stopped caring about it not long after. I'd be surprised if the port isn't bit rotten by now. But note that DICOS had nothing to do with tracepoints. > > I see the files are still in the tree, along with sprinkled references here and there. Should we just declare that dead and have the code cleaned up? No objections from me. Thanks, Pedro Alves