From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 303F038515FC for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 15:31:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 303F038515FC Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 14LFVOHM001950 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 May 2021 11:31:28 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 14LFVOHM001950 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11DE81E783; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:31:24 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: GDB Master Fails to Build on CentOS 7 To: Joel Sherrill , Eli Zaretskii via Gdb References: From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 11:31:15 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Fri, 21 May 2021 15:31:24 +0000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:31:31 -0000 On 2021-05-21 11:18 a.m., Joel Sherrill via Gdb wrote: > Hi > > This appears to be due to the older gcc apparently not defaulting to C99. > Either the code needs to change or -std=c99 needs to be passed by the build > machinery. > > ibtool: compile: gcc -O2 -g -pipe > -I/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-source-builder/rtems/build/tmp/sb-1001/7/rtems-powerpc/home/joel/rtems-work/tools/7/include > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../sourceware-mirror-binutils-gdb-ed29efb/opcodes > -I. -I../../sourceware-mirror-binutils-gdb-ed29efb/opcodes -I../bfd > -I../../sourceware-mirror-binutils-gdb-ed29efb/opcodes/../include > -I../../sourceware-mirror-binutils-gdb-ed29efb/opcodes/../bfd -W -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -g -O2 -MT ppc-dis.lo -MD > -MP -MF .deps/ppc-dis.Tpo -c > ../../sourceware-mirror-binutils-gdb-ed29efb/opcodes/ppc-dis.c -o ppc-dis.o > ../../sourceware-mirror-binutils-gdb-ed29efb/opcodes/ppc-dis.c: In function > ‘print_insn_powerpc’: > ../../sourceware-mirror-binutils-gdb-ed29efb/opcodes/ppc-dis.c:1071:8: > error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) > > Thanks. > > --joel > RTEMS > This should normally be fixed by this commit: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a8d6316b67d52eaa1b7b311084ddff71a66f7cc0 Simon