From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59923857036 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:43:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org B59923857036 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A29C1E552; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:43:16 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: How can I implement new breakpoint commands To: Nagmat Nazar , gdb@sourceware.org References: From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:43:15 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:43:17 -0000 On 2020-11-12 4:36 a.m., Nagmat Nazar via Gdb wrote: > I would like to add 3 more commands to GDB, *set, unset, list PCB *commands > and would like to break if I have the same value with the *program context > register(special register implemented by me). *How can I implement these > commands? Where can I start from? > > Kind regards, > Nagmat > Hi Nagmat, Maybe I don't understand your goal correctly, but it sounds like you could use breakpoints conditions? Simon