From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Multiple breakpoint locations
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <je4pfpnnjl.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fhe3rc$cs0$1@ger.gmane.org> (Vladimir Prus's message of "Wed\, 14 Nov 2007 09\:16\:12 +0300")
Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su> writes:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz> writes:
>>
>>> Yes, thanks. It seems strange to me that the return type needs to be
>>> specified. I thought with overloading, people talked about signature
>>> which is determined by the name and arguments but not the return type.
>>
>> For function templates the return type is part of the signature (it can
>> be parameterised with a template argument).
>
> I'm not sure it's true.
It is valid for function template instantiations to only differ in the
return type. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-06/msg02798.html>
for an example.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-13 19:15 Nick Roberts
2007-11-13 19:28 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-13 19:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-13 20:09 ` Nick Roberts
2007-11-13 20:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-13 20:18 ` Bob Rossi
2007-11-13 20:19 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-13 22:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-14 6:20 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-14 10:12 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2007-11-14 21:26 ` Jim Blandy
2007-11-14 21:34 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-14 22:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-15 4:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-15 13:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-15 16:50 ` Jim Blandy
2007-11-13 22:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-13 23:39 ` Douglas Evans
2007-11-14 4:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-14 5:02 ` Joel Brobecker
2007-11-14 6:13 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-14 18:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-14 19:00 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-17 11:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-17 12:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-17 14:14 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-11-17 15:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-11-18 1:32 ` Nick Roberts
2007-11-18 2:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-11-18 8:47 ` Nick Roberts
2007-11-19 12:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=je4pfpnnjl.fsf@sykes.suse.de \
--to=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).