From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17769 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2011 20:28:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 17759 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2011 20:28:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:28:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7UKSGEl003823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:28:16 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7UKSF1o009182; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:28:15 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7UKSEAr015644; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:28:14 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Xavier de Gaye Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb/mi log stream messages References: Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Xavier de Gaye's message of "Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:29:07 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00130.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Xavier" == Xavier de Gaye writes: Xavier> gdb version: 7.3 Xavier> In the second gdb/mi test of the following two tests, gdb/mi writes Xavier> the "No source file named foo.c.\n" message to the log stream. Xavier> The gdb/mi documentation states at section "24.4.2 GDB/MI Stream Xavier> Records" that "The log stream contains debugging messages being Xavier> produced by GDB's internals.". The above message is not a debugging Xavier> message. So, is the gdb/mi documentation wrong, or should this message Xavier> be written to the console output stream instead, or am I missing Xavier> something else ? I tend to think it should be written to the console output stream. Tom