From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-37585-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25327 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2010 20:28:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 25291 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2010 20:28:28 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:28:26 +0000
Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5NKSAIT007423	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:28:11 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5NKSAnd030981;	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:28:10 -0400
Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5NKS9u2028282;	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:28:09 -0400
Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500)	id 23A6348034; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:28:09 -0600 (MDT)
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: asmwarrior <asmwarrior@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org,        Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: About the "info locals" command of gdb and python pretty printer
References: <m3tyowgnd2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<4C21FCDC.5050503__12891.7291098789$1277296251$gmane$org@gmail.com>
Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:28:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <4C21FCDC.5050503__12891.7291098789$1277296251$gmane$org@gmail.com>	(asmwarrior@gmail.com's message of "Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:23:56 +0800")
Message-ID: <m36319bijq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2

>>>>> ">" == Asm gmail <asmwarrior@gmail.com> writes:

>> 1, It seems the current SVN std python script didn't works any
>> more.
[...]
>> All the response from gdb just gives the same as print /r XXXX.

I think this is pretty unlikely to have been caused by the recent patch.
Instead it sounds like the printers aren't being read in.

What version of Python are you using?

>> Today, I have build  gdb-cvs-20100623 , and try to make gdb crash on
>> printing some uninitialized stl containers by pretty printers. But it
>> stands through all the cases, so, it seems the gdb-cvs-20100623 is
>> quite stable than the gdb-cvs-20100619. I'm not sure what has
>> changed. It seems it more stable now.

As far as I know, nothing in this area has changed.

Tom