From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, nickc@redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp failures
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 17:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3istw94m0.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030402172825.GA32596@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> Well, do you have another suggestion for how to approach this? We're
> not actually linking; but I need to get the symbols from the input file
> into a symbol table with forged offsets in order to apply relocations
> against them.
Well, I don't really know the context. If you're not linking, then it
seems to me that you'll be better off avoiding the linking calls. The
add_symbols() call is the first phase of a link, and is expected to be
followed by the second phase of a link; despite the name
add_symbols(), it doesn't just add symbols to a hash table.
If you really just want to put the symbols into a hash table, can you
just get the symbol table generically and add them to a hash table
yourself?
> > Well, I'm afraid that you will have to deal with a number of other
> > cases if you want to avoid adding sections to input files. Take a
> > look at elf_link_create_dynamic_sections().
>
> In any case I can remove the assumption; it's not hard. I assume that
> if I save pointers to the sections present before calling
> elf_link_add_object_symbols, that they'll still be valid when it
> returns?
Probably. But I personally don't think the add_symbols() routine
needs to make any guarantees at all, except that if you hook up and
the sections and call final_link() you will get a linked output file.
Maybe we should change the name add_symbols() to initial_link().
Ian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-02 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-31 19:35 David Carlton
2003-03-31 20:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-31 21:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-31 21:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 1:09 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2003-04-01 1:38 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-04-01 10:18 ` Nick Clifton
2003-04-01 15:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 15:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-01 16:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 16:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-01 17:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 18:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <m31y0mxk8i.fsf@workshop.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>
2003-04-01 17:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 18:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-02 17:06 ` Nick Clifton
2003-04-02 17:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-02 17:21 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-04-02 17:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-02 17:44 ` Ian Lance Taylor [this message]
2003-04-02 18:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-02 20:39 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2003-04-02 20:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-02 20:53 ` Ian Lance Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3istw94m0.fsf@gossamer.airs.com \
--to=ian@airs.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).