From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23153 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2010 02:18:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 23145 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2010 02:18:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:18:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5M2I43Q030411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:18:05 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5M2I4BY008296; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:18:04 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5M2I3Un003267; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:18:03 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6E3A53792C6; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:18:03 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: asmwarrior Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: About the "info locals" command of gdb and python pretty printer References: <4C1DDBB0.9010202@gmail.com> <4C2003E8.3000407@gmail.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4C2003E8.3000407@gmail.com> (asmwarrior@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:29:28 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == Asm gmail writes: >> I'm not sure how to get a "stack track" when gdb crashed. Do I need to >> run GDB under GDB. So, the debuggee GDB get crashed, the debugger GDB >> can generate some stack trace inforamtion? Yes. Or at least, try that, and if it does not work we may need to look into alternatives. Tom