From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21357 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2005 12:44:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21159 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2005 12:44:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (205.217.158.180) by sourceware.org with QMTP; 8 Mar 2005 12:44:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 13643 invoked by uid 10); 8 Mar 2005 12:44:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 11818 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2005 12:44:02 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: drow@false.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, JBeulich@novell.com To: "Jan Beulich" Cc: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: gas: should duplicate .macro directives be allowed? References: From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 "Jan Beulich" writes: > gas/ > 2004-03-08 Jan Beulich > > * doc/as.texinfo: Add sentence to indicate redefining a macro is > an > error, and point to .purgem documentation if someone really > needs > re-definitions. > * NEWS: Mention macro redefinition is now an error. Approved. Thanks for following up. Ian