From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31384 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2011 19:01:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 31348 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2011 19:01:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:00:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p95J0rCq001949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:00:53 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p95J0pcY001512; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:00:52 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p95J0oGf016892; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:00:51 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Sterling Augustine Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Differences between gdb-index as generated by Gold and GDB itself References: Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Sterling Augustine's message of "Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:49:47 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sterling" == Sterling Augustine writes: Sterling> That is, the enumerator inside the namespace includes the enum name, Sterling> but the enumerator outside the namespace doesn't include the enum Sterling> name. Is this a bug in GDB? I think so. Sterling> The index produced by gold does include the enumerator name, and is Sterling> therefore inconsistent with GDB--I'm happy to fix one or the other, Sterling> but I'm not sure which one is right. I think the name of the enumerator should not contain the name of the enum. Tom