From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11691 invoked by alias); 3 May 2011 13:31:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 11682 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2011 13:31:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 May 2011 13:31:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p43DV5rB025674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 May 2011 09:31:05 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p43DV5W2030356; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:31:05 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p43DV4QV001427; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:31:05 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6C88E37848F; Tue, 3 May 2011 07:31:03 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: set verbose foo on? References: <20110503015145.48E3E2461A9@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 13:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110503015145.48E3E2461A9@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> (Doug Evans's message of "Mon, 2 May 2011 18:51:45 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> I've found myself from time to time wanting to be able to control Doug> gdb's verbosity on some user-related subject, but not wanting to use Doug> "set verbose on" because it'll just turn on a lot of other crap that Doug> I don't want to force on the user. [...] Doug> Any resistance to having finer-grained control on "verbosity" ? Doug> Extending "set verbose" to include "set verbose foo on" "works for me". This would be fine with me. Tom