From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17176 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2011 14:14:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 17156 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2011 14:14:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:13:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7JEDhGx015392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:13:43 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7JEDggc031087; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:13:43 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7JEDf9a006725; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:13:41 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Andrew Oakley , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Some Python ideas, looking for feedback References: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D583A2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <201108161345.33448.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D585D2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <20110817193710.59945561@ado-gentoo> <20110817201316.64fc14e5@ado-gentoo> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:51:52 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> I don't suppose we can avoid exposing this internal C wart to Python, Daniel> and expose it some other way... ? I think it depends on whether we have shipped it or not. If we have, then perhaps someone is using it; in that case I would rather not break it. However, even in that case, we can still add a new attribute with a better name and recommend that people use it. Tom