From: Jim Blandy <jimb@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: target_enable_exception_callback dead?
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3zlwng0wi.fsf@codesourcery.com> (raw)
I've noticed that the 'to_enable_exception_callback' and
'to_get_current_exception_event' target vector
entries have only one definition each. These are in inf-child.c,
which has only dummy definitions for them.
If we were to remove these altogether, there's a reasonable chunk of
code in breakpoint.c and stack.c that would go with it.
Does anyone know of any reason to keep these functions? The comments
for target_enable_exception_callback in target.h refer to HP-UX and
aCC, but the HP-UX target code in GDB isn't implementing those target
vector entries.
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-06 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-06 17:59 Jim Blandy [this message]
2007-12-06 18:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3zlwng0wi.fsf@codesourcery.com \
--to=jimb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).