From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12631 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2004 20:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12619 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2004 20:35:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2004 20:35:11 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5FKZBe3009798; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:35:11 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5FKZB025150; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:35:11 -0400 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (vpn50-49.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.49]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5FKZ8ct005498; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:35:10 -0400 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [127.0.0.1]) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5FKZ7VR026531; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:35:07 -0300 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5FKZ56W026527; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:35:05 -0300 To: Ben Elliston Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect References: <20040615141501.A19302@mailhub.air.net.au> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: Red Hat Global Engineering Services Compiler Team Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040615141501.A19302@mailhub.air.net.au> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2 On Jun 15, 2004, Ben Elliston wrote: > I propose that src/expect be removed from the tree 7 days from now > Any objections? Err... Yes, for the same reasons as dejagnu. It's not bundled with most of the OSs I used to test, and being able to build expect along with tcl/tk/etc that were built for GDB/Insight, and dejagnu, that requires it, was quite handy. Sure it's old, but it doesn't hurt as long as it works, no? And it's not like you're required to check it out. I'd rather just leave it there, like dejagnu. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}