From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23724 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2003 03:00:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23667 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2003 03:00:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2003 03:00:12 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h53305315051; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:00:05 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Andrew Cagney , dcarlton@bactrian.org, Jim Blandy , gdb Subject: Re: [rfc] struct dictionary References: <3EA89AB3.6050403@redhat.com> <3EA954D7.2070207@redhat.com> <3EB1A916.9060700@redhat.com> <3EBD4054.2070805@redhat.com> <16092.1842.33604.377224@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 03:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <16092.1842.33604.377224@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:25:54 -0400, Elena Zannoni said: > Andrew Cagney writes: >>> Is it ok to remove BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT how? > a thousand and one, and two, and three...sold to the old lady in the > pink suit... > Sure. > David, do you want to resuscitate your old patch? Consider it preapproved. Honesly, I don't see too much urgency in doing it if the dictionary patch doesn't get approved. (The dictionary patch would make BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT obsolete.) If it's bothering anybody else, I'll get rid of BLOCK_SHOULD_SORT now, but otherwise I'll just wait for a verdict on the dictionary patch. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu