From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7192 invoked by alias); 28 May 2003 16:47:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6893 invoked from network); 28 May 2003 16:46:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 May 2003 16:46:51 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4SGkmr25792; Wed, 28 May 2003 09:46:48 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: Elena Zannoni , GDB Subject: Re: RFC: DW_TAG_try_block References: <20030526124443.A7502@lucon.org> <16083.31335.661805.9131@localhost.redhat.com> <20030527075736.A22991@lucon.org> <16083.32844.434477.515378@localhost.redhat.com> <20030527081334.A23209@lucon.org> From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 16:47:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030527081334.A23209@lucon.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00367.txt.bz2 On Tue, 27 May 2003 08:13:34 -0700, "H. J. Lu" said: > When it is compiled by ecc 7.1, > # ecc -g main.cc -o main > The current gdb won't see ni nor n when break points are set in try > and catch blocks. [ Source code deleted, but thanks. ] I was going to volunteer to add this to the test suite, but it looks like something like that is already there: am I correct in thinking that gdb.c++/try-catch.exp fails if you're using ecc as your compiler? (How do you tell runtest to use a different C compiler, anyways? Does "CC=ecc runtest gdb.c++/try-catch.exp" work?) David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu