From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1362 invoked by alias); 4 May 2003 16:41:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1355 invoked from network); 4 May 2003 16:41:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 May 2003 16:41:17 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h44GfAE11130; Sun, 4 May 2003 09:41:10 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: -frame.c, frame/.c, config//frame.c, ... References: <3EB48526.9060104@redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 16:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3EB48526.9060104@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 On Sat, 03 May 2003 23:12:38 -0400, Andrew Cagney said: > Since MarkK is threatening to get the i386 using the new frame code, > now is probably the time to think about where all these frame modules > should live: > d10v-frame.[hc]: > frame/.[hc]: > config//frame.[hc]: I don't care too much, myself, but one difference between the middle and last choices is that the middle choice would generalize to non-cpu-specific stuff; do we want to eventually have, say, a directory containing all the different debug readers? (How many frame modules will there be, anyways?) David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu