From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27112 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2003 17:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27104 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2003 17:06:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2003 17:06:23 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h2BH6LX17060; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:06:21 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, drow@mvista.com Subject: Re: GCC, stabs, mangled names References: <200303110555.h2B5t5K17176@duracef.shout.net> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200303110555.h2B5t5K17176@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:55:05 -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain said: > Hi David, >> Is there a problem with gcc -gstabs+ and mangled names in recent >> GCC's? > What do you mean by "recent GCC's"? > gcc 3.2.2 and gcc gcc-3_2-branch are fine. I tested 3.1 and saw that stabs doesn't give mangled names. I don't have 3.2.2 on this machine; but, according to your tests there are regressions on namespace.exp tests with -gstabs+ from 2.95.3 to 3.2.2, which makes me suspect that the same problem is still there in 3.2.2. What's the output of gcc -gstabs+ -S -dA on this file for 3.2.2? namespace C { namespace D { int cd = 1; } } David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu