From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-14366-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 19361 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2003 17:44:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 19263 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2003 17:44:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp4.Stanford.EDU) (171.67.16.29)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2003 17:44:14 -0000
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by smtp4.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h5GHiDiI000783
	for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (jackfruit.Stanford.EDU [171.64.38.136])
	by smtp4.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5GHi9C8000749;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from carlton@localhost)
	by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5GHi9T27649;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:44:09 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 6 branch, 21st June?
References: <3EEA6240.4070401@redhat.com>
From: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:44:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <3EEA6240.4070401@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <ro1u1apdija.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 19:46:08 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:

> Still scheduled for 21st, how is that looking?

Fine with me.  (I'll be on vacation for a week starting tomorrow, by
the way, for what that's worth.)  We're in a reasonable place in my
the merges from my branch; the stuff that's most likely to be
destabilizing is still in the future, so branching now makes sense
from that point of view.  I'm not aware of any current outstanding
problems with the symtab cleanups that I've been doing; I fixed the
only regression that Michael Chastain identified.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu