From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15811 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2005 22:58:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15804 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2005 22:58:12 -0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:58:12 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-89-144.inter.net.il [80.230.89.144]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BXY99266 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:58:05 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 22:58:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <8f2776cb0511120059i659d81fcg463bba260acc9eba@mail.gmail.com> (message from Jim Blandy on Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:59:52 -0800) Subject: Re: Ordering of entries in (gdb)General Query Packets Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <8f2776cb0511111641ja864fe1o319a6374baf3a48c@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511120059i659d81fcg463bba260acc9eba@mail.gmail.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:59:52 -0800 > From: Jim Blandy > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com > > On 11/11/05, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > If the order is not important, I have no objections to moving these > > two to their proper alphabetic-order places. > > How's this, then? Fine with me, but please fix one minor problem (not related to your changes): > ! @item @samp{} > ! When @samp{q}@samp{Rcmd} is not recognized. > ! @end table > ! z ^ This `z' shouldn't be there. Thanks.