From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16495 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2005 04:09:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 16446 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2005 04:09:11 -0000 Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 04:09:11 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-56-202.inter.net.il [80.230.56.202]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CZF25074 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:09:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 04:09:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <8f2776cb0511141858x1e140278vdfe58bc3efee2a6@mail.gmail.com> (message from Jim Blandy on Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:58:56 -0800) Subject: Re: "A word-aligned memory transfer mechanism is needed" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <8f2776cb0511141858x1e140278vdfe58bc3efee2a6@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:58:56 -0800 > From: Jim Blandy > > Do folks agree that this is what that meant to say? If we're not sure > what it means, we should take it out. I'm not familiar with history, but your conclusions sound plausible.